Obama’s State Of The Union Speech Decoded

sotu-2012-tmb

Obama’s State of The Union speech was filled with soaring rhetoric, and teleprompter reading worthy of a Oscar winner, but we must make a real effort to see beyond campaign year rhetorical flourishes and take a hard look what was actually being proposed. We should seek to look beyond the cult of personality distractions/Kabuki Theater we witnessed in the SOTU and actually listen to what was being said. The substance of the speech made it abundantly clear that Obama, along with his administration, continues to be committed to a huge central government that controls every aspect of our lives, including the economy, energy, financial, health care and education sectors, with little regard for property/privacy rights or individual liberty. Let’s take a closer look at what Obama is actually proposing.

The Economy, Taxes and The National Debt
Obama began the discussion on our economy by asserting..

We can restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair share and everyone plays by the same set of rules.

We must ask ourselves; Is it “fair” that 50% of citizens in the United States pay no federal income taxes? Is it fair for the government to bailout financial institutions and corporations with trillions of dollars of taxpayer’s money? Is it fair to favor one industry over another, with government subsidies (in the form of borrowed money), while enslaving future generations to pay back that enormous debt? Is everyone really getting a fair shot and playing by the same set of rules? What seems “fair” to one person may seem very unfair to others. In this case, it appears the term “fair” is intentionally meant to be nebulous.

Obama continued to blame financial institutions for making housing loans to individuals who couldn’t afford to pay them back. What Obama failed to mention is that government meddling, and policies he supported, was the root cause of the housing bubble and the crash that followed. He failed to mention that one administration after another has pressured banks into handing out these kind of loans, culminating in the Community Reinvestment Act, a progressive idea embraced by both parties, pushing a misguided concept that everyone has a “right” to home ownership, whether they can afford it or not. It was this unholy alliance between big government progressives and greedy Wall Street bankers that caused the housing bubble, and the depression that followed after the bubble burst. This is a CLEAR example of how government meddling and central planning can have a devastating effect on the private sector and our economy, whether they had good intentions or not. “The road to hell is paved with good intentions”.

Obama went on to suggest that “they”, have agreed to cut the deficit by more than 2 trillion dollars. This is outright lie. As previously reported on UV, there are no cuts on the table, there never was, only increases in spending and increases in the national debt. By the end of Obama’s four year term as president, our national debt will have exploded, from an already massive 10 trillion dollars, to over 16 trillion dollars, which is a 60% increase. In his SOTU address, Obama clearly stated that he believes the solution to fix our economy is more big government programs, combined with increased taxes on the so called “rich”. He proposed more unaccountable bureaucracies and agencies, more central planning and control, more borrowing, printing and spending, which of course, leads to more debt.

Obama has never offered any real proposals to cut our national debt. On the contrary, his plan is to continue to grow government, spend money we don’t have and increase the debt to over 20 trillion dollars by 2016. If re-elected, Obama and his administration will have incurred more debt than all of the other presidents before him, combined. This almost criminal debt, debt that Obama once called unpatriotic, is the most dire of states the union finds itself in today. Yet, that fact was conveniently and purposely omitted from the State of the Union address.

more »

Santorum’s Iowa Win/Loss/Performance Brings Scrutiny Over His Conservative Record

santorum-thumb

After Santorum’s Narrow Iowa loss (or win, no one may ever really know), expect the see his opponents bring out the big knives. Coming out of nowhere, Santorum is a relative unknown to many GOP voters, at least on a national level. Most fiscal conservatives might not know that Santorum endorsed Arlen Specter, over Pat Toomey, in the 2004 election cycle. I would hazard to guess that Specter is not exactly the candidate the Tea Party movement, or any small government conservative, would support. There are also questions revolving around Santorum’s lack of support (or total rejection) of privacy rights under the U.S. constitution. Santorum’s rabid support for the so called ‘Patriot Act” doesn’t exactly make him a friend of privacy rights or individual liberty.

Rick Santorum voted 8 times to raise the debt ceiling and has been blasted by conservatives as the “King of Earmarks“.

Sanrotum claims to be a consistent social conservative but the Tea Party movement was never supposed to be about social issues. The Tea Party movement is supposed to be about true fiscal conservatism, small government and maximum individual liberty, and with that liberty comes individual responsibility. Is Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum really the leader it will take to save our country from big government progressives?

The big question is whether the GOP is really ready for a change in direction, and a movement back toward constitutional government, or will the Republican party continue to vote for Neocons who wrap themselves in the “Don’t Tread On Me” flag?

That still remains to be seen. However, many Tea Party patriots fear the GOP establishment is still out of touch with the base of their party and their insistence on pushing candidates like John McCain, Mitt Romney and/or Rick Santorum will result in 4 more years of Obama, whether we see a 3rd party arise in this elections cycle, or not.

Happy New Year 2012 From Upstate Voice

hnyconfet

Wishing everyone a happy, healthy and prosperous 2012.

My resolution this year is to do all I can to promote liberty, freedom and uphold the principles set forth in the U.S. Constitution. I will expose those who trample our rights and will defend those who champion our freedoms.

Let 2012 be the year we wisely send Barack Obama back into the private sector where he belongs and elect a true constitutional champion as our president.

Neocon Nikki Haley Endorses Progressive Mitt Romney

Nikkih2

Those in the Tea Party movement, who were skeptical of Governor Haley’s anti-establishment message during the campaign, had their suspicions confirmed today, as Necon Nikki rejected Tea Party constitutional conservative Michele Bachmann and instead, endorsed big government progressive Mitt Romney. It certainly makes one wonder what might be next on Haley’s agenda. Perhaps it’s the “sales tax swap” scam that’s already been floated by her administration.

There turned out to be quite a few Tea Party posers in the 2010 campaign, who are now exposing themselves with their endorsements. Governor Haley is clearly the queen of posers in this regard. She passed the largest budget in South Carolina history, gave tax breaks to those who could afford a 2nd home (but not average citizens who really needed the tax break).

So far, Nikki Haley has been a huge disappointment to Tea Party activists in SC, who are still waiting the smaller, more efficient, less intrusive government Haley promised during her campaign.

The fact of the matter is, Haley wants even more revenue to feed the bloated and wasteful bureaucratic mess that is South Carolina government, including the broken School System’s bloated bureaucracy and the debt riddled Transportation Department. Rather than cutting layers of bureaucrats, administrators and paper shufflers, who do little more than siphon off resources our State Government can’t afford, Haley’s priority is to endorse a progressive neocon like Mitt Romney.

Considering Governor Haley’s track record so far, she is looking a lot less like the constitutional conservative she pretended to be during her campaign, and more like an establishment political hack, heading straight for a one term Governorship.

GOP Cowards Who Refuse To Answer Questions From Donald Trump

nmcover

Who needs a presidential candidate too cowardly to answer questions from Donald Trump, who will be moderating the NewsMax debate in Iowa on December 27th?

The list of cowards now include progressive hacks Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman, along with the incompetent Rick Perry. More surprising is the fact that both Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann have now backed out.

Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform, said it best in a recent article on usnews.com.

The point of a Republican primary election is to choose a candidate to represent the modern Republican party in the campaign for the presidency.

Why then have Republicans allowed some nice folks from MSNBC or Bloomberg or CNN to frame the conversation between Republican candidates and Republican voters? They ask questions that liberal elites find endlessly fascinating, not questions important to Reagan Republicans.

That is why I am encouraged that Newsmax, the great conservative magazine and website run by leading conservative Christopher Ruddy, will be hosting a debate in Iowa on December 27. According to Nielson data, over 7 million Americans visit Newsmax.com each month. Four million subscribe to the Newsmax E-mail list and over a million people read the Newsmax print magazine. Therefore the debate questions will be of interest to Republicans, not liberals.

Any GOP primary candidate who is too cowardly to take questions from a NewsMax panel, moderated by Donald Trump, certainly doesn’t deserve to be the GOP presidential candidate. How will they possibly deal with Obama, or other world leaders, and more importantly, America’s enemies?

more »

Carolina Gamecocks Crush Clemson Tigers 34-13

gamecock-ride-tiger

Carolina’s record breaking season culminates in a rout of state rival Clemson Tigers in a 34-14 blowout. Gamecock QB Connor Shaw showed maturity by protecting the ball, running for 108 yards and a touchdown, while throwing for three more.

The SEC battle tested Gamecock’s defense was outstanding, holding the Tiger’s over-rated offense to 13 points. The Tigers hadn’t really faced a tough defense like Carolina, which is ranked #5 in the nation, and it showed. Clemson couldn’t get anything going on offense, only gaining 153 total yards. The Clemson Tigers were simply outclassed in this game.

If it were not for star running back Marcus Lattimore being injured in the Auburn game, the Gamecocks would most likely be playing for the SEC championship, in place of the Georgia Bulldogs, who Carolina has already beaten. Carolina should break into the top 10 with this win. Expect to see the Gamecocks get a high profile bowl game bid this year.

The Carolina Gamecocks are “for real” and they are positioned to only get better as next season arrives. Most experts consider the Gamecocks top contenders for the SEC championship in 2012.