Posts Tagged ‘National Debt’

What Has Become Of The American Dream?

The original settlers saw the American dream as an opportunity to live and worship as they pleased, without an oppressive government violating their freedoms and limiting their liberties. As our country grew and prospered, the American dream became about opportunity and the ability to make a good living, own a home, and raise a family in accordance with one’s beliefs, all the while looking to provide a better nation for future generations.

But, what is the American dream in the world we live in today?

Consider that as soon as a person reaches the age of 18, they are encouraged to take out a student loan. They spend 2 to 7 years attending college (indoctrination camp) and if all goes well, they graduate with a massive debt hanging over their heads. Not only their own personal debt, but also the massive national debt incurred by our government, which has been out of control for several decades.

If a graduate is lucky enough to find a job these days, they begin their entry level position with a huge portion of their salary going to pay interest on their debt, and another huge portion of their salary going to pay interest on the government’s debt. God forbid they used one of the “ever so easy to get” credit cards while they were a student. If they happened to go down that path, they might be paying 30% interest on credit cards, on top of all the interest they are already paying.

We need to realize that very little of this money is actually going to pay back the principal on borrowed funds. The majority of the money is going to pay interest charges on the debt, which is simply a transfer of money directly to bottom line of the banks who originally lent the funds. I would suggest that the banks are not at fault. It’s foolish borrowers who are to blame.

For most of us, home ownership is also part of the American dream. Following that dream, a person takes out a 30 year mortgage on a home. During the first 15 years of the loan, most of the payment is going to payback front loaded interest on the debt. There’s a good chance the home owner will move on to occupy another home, well before paying off any significant portion of the principle. In the past, the price of a home would tend to rise over time, so that the home owner recouped some of the money they have paid out as interest. Unfortunately, that might no longer the case.

At every step along the path to the American dream, most of the money one earns actually goes directly to the banks, or into the coffers of government. In the end, many individuals have very little to show for their lifetime of hard work, except surviving on the measly scraps our kind government has so graciously decided to give back, with funds from the insolvent Ponzi scheme we call Social Security. Sadly, this is the new consumer driven, debt based economy we find ourselves in today.

When an individual goes into debt, it’s their own personal decision. However, they need to be aware of the consequences of that debt. When the government goes into debt, the citizens have little or no say in the matter. Due to the reckless spending of our political class, average citizens are destined to become enslaved. Future generations will be working for foreign countries and international banks, against their will, in order to pay for the sins of their fathers.

Government debt is not a new phenomena, and neither is the interest on the debt. Since 1988, the U.S. government has paid out trillions in interest payments alone, trillions that could have been spent on infrastructure, social programs or simply given back to the American people in the form of lower taxes.

A National Review Online article from 2010 outlined the point of no return.

The publicly held debt as a share of GDP will exceed 60 percent this year. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), debt will reach 90 percent of GDP by 2020. The interest on this debt alone will be $916 billion annually, meaning that one in five tax dollars will be dedicated to making interest payments.

If we don’t change our mindset regarding debt, the future is certain. Trillions more in tax payer dollars will go directly to foreign countries like China, in interest payments alone. Clearly, this is unsustainable.

It’s now time to get our fiscal house in order. No longer are we going to be able to live and spend beyond our means, either as individual households, or collectively as a people. The manufacturing base in America has been devastated, due to the outsourcing of our manufacturing to cheap foreign labor markets. With manufacturing gone and with service/tech industries being increasingly in-sourced, we are left with an unsustainable consumer driven, debt based economy. The wealth is slowly being sucked out of our country, both through the purchase of cheap foreign goods/services and because of the rigged “bubble” based economic system that is in place now. We lost trillions when the Internet bubble popped in the 90s, then trillions more after the recent housing bubble burst.

For most Americans, their wealth is contained in their 401k’s and in the value of their homes, both of which were seriously degraded and/or wiped out during the financial crisis. With our economy and stock markets on shaky ground, where does that leave us now? Doesn’t it leave us broke, with no real plans to dig our way out? That is certainly the way it appears.

The “Green Jobs” mantra is a red herring. When it comes to manufacturing solar panels and wind turbines, we can’t compete with cheap labor markets. Those technologies aren’t the solution to our energy needs anyway. Private sector investments in nuclear technology and leveraging our own natural resources are options we should be seriously pursuing. We will need to abandon the hysteria created by environmental alarmists, who are pushing the fallacy that humans are somehow responsible for climate change. Real science has shown that climate has always changed, will continue to change and that human contribution is negligible in these natural processes.

Unleashed, the U.S. can maintain its position as the greatest economic force in the world today. America has always had a proclivity for innovation and a strong entrepreneurial spirit. However, a large progressive government stifles both. Entrenched establishment politicians, who have brought us to the brink, must be removed from office. At the same time, we the people must be willing to change our ways as well. We must curtail our spending, pay down our debt and not look to government to solve all of our problems. It is now time to take responsibility for ourselves.

The American dream hasn’t changed much over the last 200+ years, but if we don’t make the right choices in our own lives, and in the politicians we elect to represent our interests, the opportunity to fulfill the American dream will soon slip away, never to return.

Tea Party To GOP Establishment: Where are the cuts?

The phrase; “We need to work together, in a bi-partisan manner, to get things done” is a nice sounding, focus group tested, little sound bite, which usually draws applause from constituents on all sides of the political spectrum, but what does it really mean? Well, it really means that the political class wants to come together to pass new legislation, the purpose of which is to grow the size and scope of government, institute new taxes and fees, pass new regulations or create another unaccountable bureaucracy, which is what politicians do and what most of the ruling class think their job is. This is not what Tea Party backed representatives were elected to do. As a matter of fact, this is just the opposite of what Tea Party backed representatives were elected to do.

Does John Boehner actually think the Tea Party sent representatives to congress so they could negotiate with Democrats to increase the size and scope of Government and capitulate to Obama’s “Tax and Spend” agenda? The TEA in Tea party literally means “Taxed Enough Already”. Where are the cuts, Congressman Boehner? I’m referring to real cuts, not faux cuts, like smaller increases in growth. An increase is not a cut, no matter how you “slice” it. Where is the effort to decrease the size of scope of government and eliminate our massive debt? When was the last time politicians actually eliminated a government agency or decreased the size and reach of the Federal government? In the past, politicians have cut taxes, but they didn’t cut spending. They just ballooned the debt. These destructive policies must end.

The U.S. debt is now over 17 Trillion dollars. I just used this calculator to determine how much of the debt I owe, which is: $175,811. Please feel free to calculate the amount you owe. The average American citizen is now on the hook for approximately $120,000. This kind of outrageous debt is obviously unsustainable.

We all need to realize that there needs to be measurable decreases in the size of government or the entire system is going to collapse. Kicking the can down the road is not a strategy to solve this crisis. The Tea Party sounded the alarm but were demonized by the left, the right and the media. The demonetization needs to end. Politicians and voters need to face up to the crisis at our door and do something about it now, before it’s too late.

Obama Holds America Hostage In Attempt To Punish Success

Barack Obama is threatening to allow Federal taxes to increase on the 54% of Americans who actually pay Federal taxes, unless the GOP agrees to increase taxes on families and small businesses who earn more than 250k per year. There is no justification for increasing these taxes, being the tax increase does nothing to offset deficit spending or pay down the national debt.

Economists warn that the increased taxes would actually hurt the economy by limiting growth, resulting in fewer tax dollars flowing into the treasury, which would actually balloon the debt and deficit.

So why would Obama push for this? Well, Obama has stated that it’s just a matter of “fairness”. Clearly, the president cares more about punishing successful families and businesses, than solving the dire fiscal issues that we face as a nation.

The NYT and other media outlets have calculated that the increased taxes would generate $850 billion over 10 years, which works out to only $85 billion per year. Considering the U.S. government spent $3.5 trillion in 2011, $1.3 trillion in borrowed money, it’s clear the $85 billion per year in increased taxes does nothing to solve the fiscal issues that face all Americans. When you factor in the decrease in economic growth that comes with higher taxes, Obama’s misguided tax policy, based on some leftist notion of “fairness”, is much more detrimental to solving America’s fiscal problems, than it is beneficial.

Isn’t it time for America to reject the device class warfare policies that do nothing to solve problems? Aren’t we tired of politicians, on both sides of the aisle, who refuse to limit the size and scope of government? Perhaps it is time to point the finger at the Democrat and Republican parities for their utter failure and place the blame on squarely on them. It’s time for voters to recognize that the two parties are simply blaming one another for the problems that both of the them are equally responsible for causing.

If the two parties are unwilling to take responsibility for the problems they have caused, perhaps it’s time to consider rejecting both parties and supporting a 3rd party of responsible citizens who are actually interested in solving the critical issues we face.

Super Committee or Stupor Committee?

The gaggle of cowardly political establishment hacks, known sarcastically as the “Super Committee”, failed to come up with any more fake spending cuts in their insincere effort to decrease America’s $15 trillion dollar debt. I would strongly urge the reader to take a look at the real purpose of the “Stupor Committee”, previously explained on Upstate Voice in the article entitled: The Truth Behind The Debt Ceiling Bill (S.627)

The fact of the matter is that there were never any “cuts” on the table. Even with the $2.1 trillion of so called “cuts”, the deficit will balloon to well over $23 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. From where I stand, that amounts to a HUGE increase in the national debt, NOT a cut. Decreasing the “rate of growth” is not a “cut” and those who claim otherwise are being dishonest with the American people. Why isn’t the press setting the record straight?

It is the responsibility of the press to make clear to American citizens that there were never any “cuts” on the table. Increasing the national debt from $15 trillion dollars to over $23 trillion dollars is not a cut by any stretch of the imagination. The press should never use the term “cut” when referring to what amounts to little more than financial gimmicks used by politicians who pretend they are concerned about the debt. One can only conclude that the press is complicit in the lies and are helping to promote the scam being perpetrated on the American people.

As noted by Senator Rand Paul, a simple spending freeze would save the country $9 trillion dollars over the next 10 years. A REAL “cut” of 1% of actual spending would balance the budget in only 8 years.

The above video does an excellent job of explaining the real situation the United States finds itself in. It’s almost criminal that most of the the media refuse to report the facts and refuse to tell the truth to the American people.

I would urge everyone who happens to stumble upon this post to share it with as many people as they can, in a effort to expose the deception of entrenched politicians and their dishonest cohorts in the lamestream media.

Obama Calls For More Spending After First Stimulus Failed Miserably

As expected, Obama called for another round of stimulus spending during his much ballyhooed “Jobs Speech” before a joint session of Congress on Thursday night.

Obama proposed $450 billion in new spending while announcing the so called “American Jobs Act”, but as usual, he gave few details on how or when the new speeding would be “paid for”. According to Obama, the “rich” will be taxed more. But, who defines “rich”? If the “rich” are those making 200K or more a year, that would mean taxing small businesses, at the time we should be incentivizing small businesses. Obama went on to engage in an incomprehensible, out of both sides of the mouth, disgusting display of class warfare that brought forth a well deserved round of load moans from conservatives in the chamber.

Obama referred to the new spending as being “targeted” and I’m sure that will be the case. Just as with the first stimulus, it will be targeted to bail out liberal states whose public sector unions and their political cronies have bankrupted their treasury with ridiculous benefits and Cadillac pension/health care plans. The only jobs this stimulus will save is unionized government jobs, at the very time in our history that big government bureaucracy should be cut.

(more…)